decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2010 Issue 12 (December)
Special report: Claims-reporting problems solved with registries
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This special report covers Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) reporting options, with emphasis on how registries and EHR-connected systems are being used to support quality reporting in place of claims-based submission. It discusses the reporting environment, registry selection considerations, specialty-specific measure alignment, and general participation requirements that matter to physicians, practice managers, billers, and coding staff following Medicare quality programs.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps practices understand the broader reporting pathways available for physician quality incentives and the operational differences that can affect bonus eligibility, workflow, and administrative effort.
Article Sections
-
Claims-reporting challenges and registry alternatives
Introduces the reporting environment for PQRI and why practices looked to registries as an alternative to claims-based reporting. It frames the operational and administrative context for the rest of the article.
-
Selecting a registry for your practice
Discusses factors practices consider when choosing a registry, including support for different measures, feedback capabilities, and integration options. It also references how registry availability can vary by year and by practice type.
-
Using a registry with your EHR
Describes a practice workflow that combines an EHR with registry reporting. It covers internal coordination, documentation review, and how measure selection aligned with the practice’s reporting goals.
-
Using a standalone registry system
Explains a registry workflow that uses a web-based platform rather than direct EHR submission. It focuses on specialty measures group reporting and the steps involved in collecting and entering patient data.
-
PQRI registry requirements for your practice
Summarizes general participation requirements for reporting through a registry, including broad reporting periods and encounter-qualification concepts. It also notes differences between registry and claims reporting.
-
Survey: PQRI registry adoption remains low despite benefits
Presents survey commentary on registry adoption and practitioner attitudes toward PQRI reporting. It includes general bonus trends and sentiment about the reporting burden.
-
14 measures group intent codes
Lists the measures group intent codes used in claims-based reporting and explains their relationship to registry reporting at a high level. It also identifies the groups associated with those codes.
What You Will Learn
- How PQRI reporting can be handled through registries, EHRs, or claims
- What factors influence registry selection for a medical practice
- How registry workflows may differ when connected to an EHR versus a standalone platform
- What general requirements apply to registry participation and measures group reporting
- How survey findings and CMS commentary shaped interest in registry reporting
Who Should Read This
- Physician practices
- Medical coders
- Billers
- Practice managers
- Quality reporting staff
- Compliance staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com