decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2002 Issue 7 (July)
Special Report
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains why consult billing is receiving increased attention from the OIG and Medicare-related auditors, with a focus on specialty practice patterns and documentation issues. It reviews broad guidance for distinguishing consultations from referrals or visits, including common scenarios such as pre-operative evaluations, same-day services by different physicians, subsequent referrals, and continued follow-up after an initial consult. The content is aimed at physicians, coders, billing staff, and compliance professionals who handle E/M consultation claims.
Why This Topic Matters
Consult claims are a high-scrutiny area with meaningful compliance and audit implications, so understanding the general documentation and billing framework helps practices reduce denials and review risk.
Article Sections
-
Audit focus and consult billing trends
Overview of the government audit focus on consultations and the specialty utilization context discussed in the article. The section frames why consult claims attract attention in physician billing.
-
Consult or not? A few commonly confused scenarios
Discussion of several broad encounter types that can create uncertainty when deciding whether a service should be treated as a consultation or another type of physician service. The section introduces scenario-based considerations without providing a decision tree.
-
Pre-operative clearances as consults
General discussion of pre-operative evaluation situations and the documentation context surrounding them. The section also references Medicare and payer policy considerations.
-
Same-day consults
Discussion of same-day services by physicians in related specialties or within the same practice, including the documentation issues that commonly arise. The section addresses appeal and review concerns at a high level.
-
Subsequent referrals
Examples of referral chains involving multiple specialists and how the article frames those encounters in a consult context. The section focuses on the workflow between physicians rather than specific coding outcomes.
-
Physician asked to consult, but continues to see the patient
Discussion of follow-up care after an initial consultation and how the article distinguishes the first encounter from later services. The section stays focused on general billing context.
-
Consult or Visit? Here’s how to tell the difference
A comparison of broad characteristics associated with consultations versus referrals/visits. The section presents general distinctions used in physician billing.
-
3 “R’s” vital to billing consults: Request, Render service, Report
High-level documentation themes the article associates with consultation billing, including communication between physicians and the handling of follow-up care. The section also notes broader policy updates affecting who may generate or perform consults.
-
Make sure advice or opinion was specifically requested
Discussion of the importance of a specific request for physician advice or opinion in the consult framework. The section also addresses the article’s general treatment of cases where the course of care is known or unknown.
What You Will Learn
- How consult billing is being scrutinized by government auditors
- What broad factors make consultation services relevant to compliance review
- How the article distinguishes consultations from referrals and office visits at a general level
- Why documentation and inter-physician communication matter for consult claims
- What types of encounter scenarios often create uncertainty in physician billing
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com