decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2016 Issue 9 (September)
Transition to ICD-10: 2017 coding guidelines clarify definition of ‘with,’ when to use bilateral codes
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews major changes in the 2017 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting and explains why they matter for coding accuracy, documentation review, and claim outcomes. It is aimed at coders, auditors, compliance staff, and other revenue cycle professionals who need to understand updated guidance across general conventions and several diagnosis chapters.
Why This Topic Matters
The 2017 guideline revisions affect how coders interpret documentation, apply chapter-specific reporting rules, and align claims with updated ICD-10-CM guidance. Understanding the scope of these changes helps reduce avoidable denials and supports more consistent diagnosis coding practices.
Article Sections
-
Overview of the 2017 ICD-10-CM guideline revisions
Introduces the revised official guidelines and explains their role in the first ICD-10-CM update cycle. Summarizes the broad areas of guidance that were revised across the document.
-
General coding convention updates
Covers revisions to core ICD-10-CM conventions and general guidance, including terminology and sequencing concepts. This section also notes updates affecting laterality and the reporting of certain clinical scales.
-
Chapter-specific coding changes
Summarizes updates tied to selected diagnosis chapters, including guidance on injury, poisoning, infectious disease, endocrine, circulatory, and neurologic-related coding topics. The section highlights where the new or revised instructions apply within chapter-based reporting.
What You Will Learn
- Which parts of the ICD-10-CM official guidelines were revised for 2017
- How the update affects general coding conventions and chapter-specific guidance
- Which clinical reporting topics received new or clarified guidance
- Why updated documentation interpretation can affect denial risk and claim accuracy
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Revenue cycle staff
- Clinical documentation improvement specialists
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com