decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2013 Issue 7 (July)
Withstand auditor scrutiny with 7 ways to bolster your E/M documentation
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses common documentation issues that can draw auditor attention to higher-level evaluation and management claims, and it outlines broad educational and documentation practices used to improve support for those services. It is aimed at physicians, coders, compliance staff, and practice managers who review E/M documentation, physician education, and audit preparedness.
Why This Topic Matters
Higher-level E/M services are closely watched by Medicare contractors and other oversight entities, so documentation quality and internal education can affect audit exposure and claim support. The article is relevant for practices looking to evaluate documentation habits, chart review processes, and provider training around E/M coding.
Article Sections
-
Common documentation problems in high-level E/M claims
Introduces concerns that can arise when higher-level E/M claims increase and outlines the kinds of documentation patterns that attract review. Discusses the role of audit scrutiny and the importance of medical necessity support.
-
Don’t overdocument
Addresses documentation practices that can create excess or repetitive content in notes and why that can be problematic for review. Focuses on general pitfalls tied to electronic documentation and copied material.
-
Don’t underdocument
Covers the need for adequate and relevant chart detail without using vague or incomplete notation. Emphasizes the importance of capturing pertinent information in a readable way.
-
Show your work
Explains the value of making clinical reasoning visible in the note and supporting the level of service with documented thought process. Includes discussion of how documentation can reflect assessment and decision-making.
-
Sicker isn’t always higher
Reviews the distinction between patient complexity and code level support. Describes how patient appearance alone does not determine the appropriate level of E/M service.
-
If you claim for time, claim correctly
Discusses time-based E/M reporting in encounters where counseling or coordination of care predominates. Covers broad documentation expectations for reflecting time spent on encounter activities.
-
Little things mean a lot
Highlights basic documentation completeness issues that can affect whether a note is accepted in review. Mentions practical recordkeeping details that help avoid technical problems.
-
Train your M.D.s
Focuses on physician education, chart audit follow-up, and feedback methods to improve documentation habits. Includes practice-level review strategies and ongoing performance comparison concepts.
What You Will Learn
- How common E/M documentation patterns can affect audit risk
- What types of charting habits practices should review for completeness and clarity
- How physician education can support better documentation and compliance
- Why time-based documentation matters in certain E/M encounters
- How practices may use internal review and comparative reporting to monitor E/M habits
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Coders
- Compliance staff
- Practice managers
- Auditors
- Healthcare administrators
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com