HCPro, JustCoding Outpatient - 2018 Issue 31 (July)
2019 MPFS proposed rule: CMS addresses E/M subjectivity by simplifying code processes
July 31st, 2018
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains proposed CMS changes in the 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule that would affect evaluation and management reporting for office and other outpatient services. It is aimed at coders, billers, auditors, compliance staff, and clinicians who need to understand the scope of the proposal, the affected code families, and the broad reimbursement and documentation themes discussed in the rule.
Why This Topic Matters
The proposal could alter how common E/M visits are selected, documented, paid, and audited, so it matters for organizations that code or bill office and outpatient encounters. It also highlights potential payer differences and specialty-specific impacts that could influence revenue cycle planning.
Article Sections
-
Overview of the 2019 MPFS proposal
Introduces the proposed Medicare changes and the article’s focus on E/M services for office and outpatient settings. Summarizes why the topic is significant for coding and billing workflows.
-
Current E/M documentation challenges
Reviews the general subjectivity of E/M reporting and the role of longstanding CMS documentation guidance. Discusses the broader documentation environment and why simplification is being considered.
-
Proposed level-of-service selection options
Describes the main approaches CMS is considering for selecting E/M service levels in office and other outpatient encounters. Covers the broad categories of time-based, documentation-based, and medical decision-making-based selection.
-
Proposed payment changes for office visits
Explains the proposal for a single base payment approach and its effect on new and established patient office visit groups. Includes discussion of the reimbursement framework and related payment estimates.
-
Documentation and operational concerns
Addresses ongoing documentation expectations, payer variability, audit considerations, and specialty-specific concerns. Discusses how the proposal could affect different provider types and practice settings.
-
Add-on codes for complexity and prolonged services
Covers proposed add-on payment concepts for certain provider categories and the discussion of prolonged service reporting. Also notes the article’s treatment of specialty-based reporting patterns.
-
Minor procedures and modifier -25
Discusses the interaction between E/M visits and same-day minor procedures, including proposed changes affecting payment for those services. Reviews the broader audit and documentation issues associated with this scenario.
-
Summary
Closes with the article’s overall assessment of the proposal and its anticipated effect on E/M reporting burden. Reinforces the article’s general perspective on simplification and workflow impact.
What You Will Learn
- What CMS proposed in the 2019 MPFS rule for office and outpatient E/M services
- Which general approaches were discussed for selecting E/M service levels
- How the proposal could affect payment methodology and documentation expectations
- Which specialty and workflow concerns were raised in connection with the proposal
- How the article frames prolonged services and same-day minor procedure issues at a broad level
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding educators
- Auditors
- Compliance staff
- Physician practices
- Hospital outpatient billing teams
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Clinicians who document E/M services
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com