HCPro, JustCoding Inpatient - 2016 Issue 21 (May)
Claims-based quality proposals and cost measures in 2017 IPPS proposed rule
May 31st, 2016
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews proposed changes in the FY 2017 IPPS rule that affect hospital claims-based quality and cost measurement. It is aimed at CDI, HIM, coding, and quality professionals who need a high-level understanding of measure revisions, program timing, and the relationship between reporting, scoring, and payment across major CMS hospital programs.
Why This Topic Matters
The proposals discussed in the article can influence future hospital reimbursement, quality scores, and internal documentation priorities. Understanding the scope of the changes helps hospitals prepare for measure updates, mixed-code-set reporting periods, and alignment between CDI, coding, and quality teams.
Article Sections
-
Risk standardized readmission rates
Discusses a proposed addition to the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and the related timing of performance evaluation.
-
Risk-adjusted Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 90 composite
Covers proposed updates to a hospital safety composite measure, including changes to measure structure, weighting, and implementation timing across CMS programs.
-
Risk-standardized mortality measures
Summarizes a proposed mortality measure related to coronary artery bypass graft care and its expected role in hospital value-based purchasing.
-
Cost measures
Describes proposed new hospital cost and efficiency measures, their measurement periods, and their relationship to value-based payment assessment.
-
Summary
Wraps up the article with a general discussion of reporting, payment impact, and the need for coordination between CDI and quality teams.
What You Will Learn
- How the proposed rule changes relate to major CMS hospital quality and payment programs
- Which broad categories of measures are being refined or added
- How timing and performance periods affect hospital reporting and assessment
- Why CDI and quality alignment matters for claims-based measures
Who Should Read This
- Clinical documentation improvement professionals
- Health information management professionals
- Medical coders
- Hospital quality staff
- Revenue integrity teams
- Value-based purchasing stakeholders
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com