Identify opportunities from audits

August 12th, 2015

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article explains how audit findings can be used to educate coders, physicians, and CDI staff when documentation and clinical interpretation do not align. It focuses on broad coding-relevance topics such as ESRD-related volume overload, pulmonary findings, anemia terminology, and heart failure phenotypes, with references to ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-related documentation concepts. The piece is aimed at coding professionals and CDI teams who review complex inpatient charts and want to understand where audit-driven education may improve documentation quality.

Why This Topic Matters

Audit-based education can affect documentation accuracy, clinical communication, and code assignment in complex cases involving renal disease, cardiac dysfunction, and related findings. It helps readers recognize where chart language may not support assumptions and where clinical context matters.

Article Sections

  1. Volume overload in ESRD patients

    Discussion of audit observations in a renal patient scenario and the documentation themes that arose from reviewing laboratory values, imaging, and clinical status. The section frames how coders and CDI specialists may encounter conflicting interpretations in complex inpatient records.

  2. Is it systolic or diastolic or both?

    Overview of heart failure terminology, changes over time, and the need to consider current clinical context when reviewing left ventricular function. The section addresses how audit review can reveal documentation differences among providers and across encounters.

What You Will Learn

  • How audit reviews can reveal documentation and coding education opportunities
  • How renal, cardiac, and anemia-related documentation issues may surface in complex charts
  • How heart failure terminology can vary across clinicians and encounters
  • Why clinical context matters when reviewing chart language and reported findings

Who Should Read This

  • Medical coders
  • Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) specialists
  • Physicians
  • Coding auditors
  • Health information management professionals

Codes Discussed

  • ICD-9-CM: 403.91
  • ICD-9-CM: 585.6
  • ICD-9-CM: 514
  • ICD-9-CM: 428.33
  • ICD-9-CM: 285.29
  • ICD-9-CM: 584.9
  • ICD-9-CM: 285.21
  • ICD-9-CM: 285.22

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • HCPro's JustCoding Newsletters +Archives

The JustCoding® Newsletter is a fantastic resource for coding professionals. Whether you're an inpatient or outpatient coder, a veteran or new to the job, JustCoding will keep your skills sharp and help you stay abreast of CMS changes.


demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?