HCPro, JustCoding Outpatient - 2019 Issue 22 (June)
OIG audit pinpoints ICD-10-CM coding errors
June 4th, 2019
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a May Office of Inspector General review of diagnosis coding errors identified in Medicare Advantage claims and describes why those findings matter for physician practices, coding staff, and risk-adjustment reporting. It focuses on broad ICD-10-CM diagnosis coding issues involving acute stroke, depression, and ongoing condition capture, along with general guidance from coding experts on documentation consistency and encounter-level reporting. The piece is relevant to coders, auditors, compliance staff, and practices working under CMS risk-adjustment payment models.
Why This Topic Matters
The article highlights how diagnosis coding accuracy can affect risk-adjustment payments, compliance exposure, and reimbursement in Medicare Advantage settings. It helps readers understand why consistent diagnosis capture and appropriate documentation review are important in routine practice workflows.
Article Sections
-
OIG audit findings and payment impact
Summarizes the audit background, the scope of the review, and the general significance of the findings for physician practices and Medicare Advantage risk adjustment.
-
Changing your approach
Discusses broader shifts in diagnosis coding expectations for practices participating in risk-adjustment models and the role of CMS-linked payment methodology.
-
A closer look at the OIG’s findings
Reviews the main categories of diagnosis-coding issues examined in the audit, with emphasis on stroke- and depression-related claims patterns.
-
Seeking coding solutions
Presents general coding and documentation themes for history, sequela, severity capture, and ongoing condition reporting across encounters.
What You Will Learn
- How an OIG audit can reveal diagnosis coding problems in Medicare Advantage claims
- Why risk-adjustment coding accuracy matters for physician practices
- How documentation consistency affects diagnosis capture across encounters
- What broad coding areas are commonly associated with stroke- and depression-related audit findings
- How ongoing conditions and encounter-level reporting are discussed in risk-adjustment settings
Who Should Read This
- Physician coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Physician practice managers
- Risk-adjustment coding teams
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com