PSI-90’s transformation into The Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite

June 14th, 2016

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article explains proposed changes to AHRQ’s PSI 90 measure as discussed in the 2017 IPPS proposed rule. It focuses on the measure’s new name, its role in CMS hospital pay-for-performance programs, changes to the PSIs included in the composite, and the broader implications for CDI, coding, and quality teams. The piece is relevant to hospital coders, CDI professionals, quality leaders, and revenue cycle staff who monitor claims-based quality measures and value-based purchasing programs.

Why This Topic Matters

Changes to hospital safety composite measures can affect quality reporting, organizational performance assessment, and value-based payment outcomes. Understanding the evolving measure structure helps CDI, coding, and quality teams prepare for updated specifications and align internal processes with CMS reporting expectations.

Article Sections

  1. Nothing new here

    Summarizes the purpose of the revised hospital safety composite and its continued role in CMS quality and value-based purchasing programs. It also describes the general approach used to assess performance and risk adjustment at a high level.

  2. PSIs in the CMS composite will change

    Reviews which patient safety indicators are included in the composite and notes that the composition is being revised. The section also addresses proposed re-specification of selected indicators.

  3. Composite weights are revised

    Describes proposed changes to the weighting approach used in the composite and the general factors affecting how measure performance contributes to the overall score.

  4. Preparation challenges

    Explains implementation timing issues, draft specification availability, and the need to review evolving measure materials. The section highlights the planning challenges posed by delayed finalized guidance.

  5. What to do in the interim?

    Provides broad preparation themes for CDI, quality, and coding teams while the measure remains under refinement. The section emphasizes coordination, education, and review of draft materials.

  6. Summary

    Concludes with the broader significance of patient safety performance and the importance of data quality for improvement efforts. It also notes the value of existing CDI infrastructure for adapting to measure changes.

What You Will Learn

  • How PSI 90 is changing in the context of CMS hospital quality programs
  • What broad measure components are being revised
  • Why measure timing and draft specifications create operational challenges
  • How CDI and quality teams can prepare for evolving claims-based safety measures
  • Why data quality remains important for patient safety performance measurement

Who Should Read This

  • Hospital CDI professionals
  • Medical coders
  • HIM professionals
  • Quality improvement teams
  • Revenue cycle and reimbursement staff
  • Hospital administrators

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • HCPro's JustCoding Newsletters +Archives

The JustCoding® Newsletter is a fantastic resource for coding professionals. Whether you're an inpatient or outpatient coder, a veteran or new to the job, JustCoding will keep your skills sharp and help you stay abreast of CMS changes.


demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?