HCPro, JustCoding Outpatient - 2016 Issue 3 (January)
Q&A: Should we manually code modifier –CT or hardcode it?
January 19th, 2016
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses a radiology billing question about whether a CT-related modifier should be built into a charge description master or applied selectively. It is aimed at hospital billing, revenue integrity, and coding staff who manage CT scan charging workflows and want to understand the scope of the CMS guidance referenced in the answer. The discussion centers on the general circumstances in which the modifier is relevant, the need to distinguish equipment that does or does not meet a specified standard, and the fact that the article points readers to official CMS and transmittal guidance for the detailed code list.
Why This Topic Matters
Facilities that perform CT imaging need to apply billing edits consistently across scanners and service lines. Understanding when this modifier is relevant helps reduce miscoding risk and avoid inappropriate payment impacts.
What You Will Learn
- What issue the radiology department is trying to address
- How the article frames the decision to hardcode or apply the modifier selectively
- What kinds of CMS guidance the answer references
- Why equipment differences matter in the billing workflow
- Why facilities with multiple CT scanners need a review process
Who Should Read This
- Radiology billing staff
- Hospital coding staff
- Revenue integrity teams
- Charge master/CDM analysts
- Compliance staff
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com