Q&A: Using modifier -59 to bypass a procedure-to-procedure edit

August 25th, 2020

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article reviews a coding question about whether modifier -59 can be used to address an NCCI procedure-to-procedure edit involving toe-related services. It is aimed at coders and billing staff who work with CPT reporting, NCCI edits, and modifier use, and it summarizes guidance from the 2020 NCCI Manual in a question-and-answer format.

Why This Topic Matters

It helps readers recognize when a bundled-edit scenario involves overlapping anatomical sites and when the article’s cited guidance says the modifier should not be used, supporting more accurate reporting and fewer claim errors.

What You Will Learn

  • How the article frames an NCCI procedure-to-procedure edit question
  • What general topic areas the cited NCCI guidance addresses
  • How the article discusses modifier use in relation to toe and nail services
  • Which coding references and professional resources are mentioned in the discussion

Who Should Read This

  • Medical coders
  • Coding auditors
  • Billing staff
  • Practice managers
  • Podiatry coding staff

Codes Discussed

  • CPT: 11055
  • CPT: 11721
  • CPT: 11720

Modifiers Discussed

  • CPT: -59

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • HCPro's JustCoding Newsletters +Archives

The JustCoding® Newsletter is a fantastic resource for coding professionals. Whether you're an inpatient or outpatient coder, a veteran or new to the job, JustCoding will keep your skills sharp and help you stay abreast of CMS changes.


demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?