You Be the Coder: Understand the Difference Between Modifiers 66 and 62

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by AAPC. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This Find-A-Code article is a coding Q&A about reporting surgeon involvement in a liver transplant scenario. It focuses on when a case is treated as work by two surgeons versus a broader surgical team, and it discusses the related documentation and reporting context for transplant-related procedures. The article is aimed at coders and billers who need to understand surgical co-surgery versus team surgery concepts in a transplant setting.

Why This Topic Matters

Correctly identifying surgeon participation affects how complex operative work is reported and how claims are interpreted by payers. This topic is especially relevant for transplant-related services, where documentation and procedure reporting must align with the surgical arrangement.

Article Sections

  1. Question

    Presents a liver transplant scenario involving more than one surgeon and asks how the work should be reported. The question frames the issue around surgical participation and modifier selection.

  2. Answer

    Explains the reporting approach for the surgeons involved and references the related procedure reporting context. It also contrasts the scenario with broader surgical team reporting.

  3. Why not 66

    Discusses why the case does not fit the broader surgical team modifier concept described in the article. It also notes general considerations about procedures that may qualify for that type of reporting.

  4. Take note

    Includes a brief expert note on how the modifier has been used over time and the circumstances in which it may still arise. The note places the topic in a broader transplant-coding context.

What You Will Learn

  • How the article distinguishes between co-surgeon reporting and surgical team reporting
  • How liver transplant-related surgeon participation is discussed in a coding context
  • What general documentation issues are associated with multiple-surgeon procedures
  • How the article frames the use of team-based surgical reporting in transplant cases

Who Should Read This

  • Medical coders
  • Billing staff
  • Compliance teams
  • Transplant surgery coding professionals
  • Physician practice managers

Codes Discussed

Modifiers Discussed


Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Stay informed, get answers to your E/M coding and documentation questions, and find the help you need to bank your deserved pay with your subscription to TCI’s E/M Coding Alert.

  • Current newsletters added each month
  • Fully searchable archives - over 500 articles
  • ALL years/issues back to 2013 organized by year and issue
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles

This feature is currently unavailable for online purchase. For more information, please call 801-770-4203 or Contact Us.

Related Articles

Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?