E/M Coding Alert - 2007 Issue 32
The 3 Deadly Myths That Could Be Hindering Your E/M Chart Audits
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses three common misunderstandings about evaluation and management (E/M) chart audits and how audit expectations can vary by payer and documentation framework. It is aimed at coding and auditing professionals who work with E/M services and need to understand broad audit considerations without relying on a single assumed standard.
Why This Topic Matters
E/M audits are a major area of coding review, and incorrect assumptions about audit criteria or documentation review can affect compliance and audit preparedness. Understanding the general scope of payer-specific review approaches helps auditors and coders align their processes more effectively.
What You Will Learn
- Common misconceptions that may affect E/M chart audit processes
- Why audit criteria may differ across payers
- How audit review may involve more than one documentation guideline set
- General documentation considerations relevant to history and ROS review
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Physician educators
- Revenue cycle professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com