E/M Coding Alert - 2020 Issue 3
Documentation: Coders Identify 4 Common ED Coding Errors
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews four recurring documentation and coding issues seen in emergency department records and explains why they matter for coding accuracy, compliance, and claim defensibility. It is aimed at coders, auditors, revenue integrity staff, and ED clinicians who want to understand how documentation practices affect evaluation and management reporting, medical necessity support, and payer scrutiny.
Why This Topic Matters
Emergency department coding depends heavily on documentation quality, and incomplete or vague records can lead to lost billing opportunities, denials, or compliance concerns. The article helps readers recognize common problem areas in ED documentation so they can better evaluate chart support for coding and reimbursement.
Article Sections
-
Introduction
The article introduces recurring documentation and compliance issues observed in emergency department coding. It frames the discussion around practical problems that affect chart review and reimbursement support.
-
Problem 1: Writing “Old Records Reviewed”
This section discusses vague documentation of prior record review and why it may be difficult for coders to interpret. It focuses on how documentation quality affects assessment of data review and medical decision making.
-
Problem 2: Missing Documentation That Supports Higher Code Levels
This section addresses incomplete documentation that can prevent higher-level evaluation and management coding. It covers broad documentation elements such as history, exam, time, and medical decision making.
-
Problem 3: Failing to Document Medical Necessity for Tests
This section explains the importance of documenting the rationale for diagnostic testing in the emergency department. It centers on medical necessity, ordering context, and chart support for tests.
-
Problem 4: Accurately Conveying Risk Levels
This section covers documentation of clinician reasoning related to risk in evaluation and management visits. It highlights the role of documented thought process in supporting risk assessment and audit defense.
What You Will Learn
- How common emergency department documentation issues can affect coding review
- Why vague charting can limit support for evaluation and management reporting
- How documentation completeness influences medical necessity and risk assessment
- What kinds of documentation support stronger compliance and defensibility
Who Should Read This
- Emergency department coders
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Revenue integrity staff
- Emergency department physicians
- Clinical documentation improvement staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com