E/M Coding Alert - 2016 Issue 10
Modifiers: CMS Says 'Use Modifier 51'--Some MACs Say 'Not So Fast'
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a Medicare-focused coding update about modifier 51 and why payer guidance can differ from CMS advice. It is relevant to coders, billing staff, and compliance teams who handle surgical claims and need to understand how Medicare contractors and other payers may approach multiple-procedure reporting.
Why This Topic Matters
Differences between CMS guidance and contractor workflow can affect claim submission practices, payer-specific billing policies, and how coders coordinate with Medicare and other insurers.
Article Sections
-
Use Modifier on ‘More Major’ Surgery
This section summarizes CMS guidance on multiple procedures and the general Medicare context for surgical claims. It discusses the broad billing scenario addressed in the article and the role of modifier 51.
-
MACs Often See Things Differently
This section describes how Medicare administrative contractors may differ from CMS guidance and emphasizes payer-specific policy review. It also covers the need to verify local requirements before submitting claims.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames CMS guidance on multiple-procedure reporting
- Why Medicare contractor preferences can differ from national guidance
- Why payer policy review is important for surgical claim submission
- Which organizations are referenced in the discussion of modifier 51
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing specialists
- Revenue cycle staff
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com