E/M Coding Alert - 2006 Issue 12
P4P: AMA Defends Quality Improvement Deal With Congress
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers the AMA’s defense of a deal with Congress related to physician quality measurement and pay-for-performance development. It summarizes concerns raised by specialty societies, the AMA’s explanation of the agreement, and the role of CMS quality reporting efforts and CPT-related measure development. The piece is relevant to physicians, specialty groups, coding professionals, and others tracking quality reporting policy and physician payment initiatives.
Why This Topic Matters
The article helps readers understand how physician quality measures, reporting programs, and coding-related updates intersect with broader pay-for-performance policy discussions. It is useful for evaluating the policy and administrative direction of quality reporting initiatives without needing the full premium text.
What You Will Learn
- How the AMA responds to criticism of its agreement with Congress on physician quality measures
- What broad categories of quality-reporting and pay-for-performance activity are discussed
- How CMS reporting efforts and CPT-based measure development are connected in the article
- Why specialty societies viewed the agreement as significant for physician payment policy
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Specialty medical societies
- Medical coders
- Coding managers
- Practice administrators
- Health policy professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com