E/M Coding Alert - 2005 Issue 28
PHYSICIAN NOTES: You Can't Hurry Quality, Surgeons Tell Congress
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This news article covers a surgical specialty coalition’s comments on phased quality measurement for pay-for-performance, along with separate Medicare and health policy developments. It also touches on a CMS modifier update for services provided in Health Professional Shortage Areas, making it relevant to physicians, surgeons, coders, compliance staff, and practice administrators tracking quality, reporting, and reimbursement changes.
Why This Topic Matters
The piece matters because it reflects how quality measurement initiatives and Medicare administrative changes can affect physician reporting, compliance planning, and claims processes. It also flags a modifier transition that practices may need to recognize in future billing workflows.
Article Sections
-
Surgical quality measures and pay-for-performance
Discusses a surgeon-led request for phased implementation of quality measurement in a performance-based payment context. The section focuses on broad categories of surgical quality monitoring and the organizations involved.
-
Other news
Summarizes several unrelated health policy and Medicare developments, including administrative hearing operations, a fraud case, patient safety legislation, and a billing-related modifier update.
What You Will Learn
- How surgical specialty groups are approaching quality measurement policy
- What broader Medicare and health policy updates were noted in the same article
- Which reporting and billing topics were highlighted for physicians and practices
- How a CMS modifier change was framed in relation to services in shortage areas
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Surgeons
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
- Health policy readers
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com