E/M Coding Alert - 2011 Issue 29
Reader Question: Consider Modifier 22 for Extra Work
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This reader Q&A discusses billing considerations for complicated recurrent ventral hernia repair cases when infection or related operative complexity is present. It addresses how the article distinguishes open versus laparoscopic approaches, the general role of mesh-related services in those settings, and when modifier 22 may be relevant for extra work. The content is aimed at coding professionals and billers who need to evaluate whether the topic applies to their surgical claims workflow.
Why This Topic Matters
Complicated hernia repairs can involve services that are not always reported the same way across approaches, so understanding the scope of the article helps coders review claim setup and documentation needs before submission.
Article Sections
-
Question
Introduces a reader scenario involving recurrent ventral hernia repair and asks about billing considerations for additional operative work.
-
Answer
Summarizes the coding discussion by approach, including open and laparoscopic repair contexts, mesh-related considerations, and the potential use of modifier 22 when extra work is documented.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames coding questions for recurrent ventral hernia repair cases
- How the discussion is organized by open versus laparoscopic surgical approach
- What general situations the article says may prompt review of modifier 22
- How the article treats mesh-related services in the context of recurrent hernia repair
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Billing staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Surgical practice administrators
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com