E/M Coding Alert - 2013 Issue 6
Reader Question: Don't Look for Clip Placement Pay
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This reader question explains why a claim for professional payment tied to image-guided metallic localization clip placement was denied and discusses the general reimbursement structure behind that denial. It is aimed at coders, billers, and revenue cycle staff who work with breast biopsy-related services, CPT® add-on coding, and Medicare physician fee schedule concepts in facility-based settings.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding when a service is separately reimbursable versus bundled to the facility affects denial management, charge capture, and expectations for professional payment in hospital settings.
Article Sections
-
Question
The reader presents a denial scenario involving a breast biopsy-related add-on service and asks whether the claim should be appealed.
-
Answer
The response addresses whether separate professional reimbursement is available and frames the issue in terms of payer payment policy.
-
How it works
This section discusses the broader payment structure referenced by the article, including Medicare physician fee schedule concepts and how facility-based payment is handled.
What You Will Learn
- How a denial for a facility-based add-on service may be interpreted
- The relationship between professional payment and facility payment for certain procedures
- How the article frames reimbursement concepts under the Medicare physician fee schedule
- Why some services may not generate separate payment in hospital settings
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billers
- Revenue cycle staff
- Physician practice managers
- Breast imaging and surgical coding staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com