E/M Coding Alert - 2013 Issue 10
Reader Question: Don't Try to Split 28296 and 64450
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article answers a coding question about whether two separately billed services can be paid independently when a payer has denied one as incidental. It focuses on claim bundling, National Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits, and when modifier 59 is considered in the context of a foot surgery and a peripheral nerve block. The piece is aimed at coders and billing staff who need to understand general bundling guidance and payer edit behavior without reading a long policy document.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps coders and billers recognize when a denial may be driven by standard bundling edits rather than a simple claim-entry issue. The article is relevant to anyone handling surgical claims that include anesthesia-related services and potential modifier use.
Article Sections
-
Question
Introduces the coding scenario and the payer denial issue being questioned.
-
Answer
Summarizes the general factors discussed for determining whether separate reporting may be considered and references the applicable edit framework and modifier topic.
-
Caveat
Adds a cautionary note about when separate reporting would not be appropriate in the scenario.
What You Will Learn
- How bundling edits can affect separate reporting of services on the same claim
- What general factors are discussed when considering modifier use
- How CCI edits and modifier 59 are referenced in relation to payer denials
- What kinds of claim scenarios may trigger incidental-service denials
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Podiatry practice staff
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com