E/M Coding Alert - 2012 Issue 44
Reader Question: 'Overdocumenters' May Not Qualify for 99215
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This reader question addresses how office/outpatient E/M service levels are determined for established patients and why strong documentation alone may not justify a higher level of service. It highlights CMS guidance, the role of medical necessity, and risks associated with EHR-driven automatic coding. The article is aimed at coders, auditors, compliance staff, and clinicians who need a high-level understanding of E/M level selection principles.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate E/M selection affects compliance, audit risk, and proper reporting in practices that rely heavily on documentation or EHR auto-coding. The article helps readers understand the broader factors that should govern level selection without relying solely on note volume or template-driven output.
What You Will Learn
- How E/M service levels are generally selected for established patients
- Why documentation quantity alone may not support a higher reported level
- How CMS guidance relates to medical necessity in E/M reporting
- Why EHR auto-coding can create compliance concerns
- How medical decision making and medical necessity are discussed in the context of E/M selection
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians and clinical staff
- Revenue cycle teams
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com