E/M Coding Alert - 2005 Issue 8
Reader Questions: Obtain Doctor's Findings for UA
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses a practical coding question involving urinalysis, reflex testing, and claim denials. It explains the general issue of when laboratory findings can support diagnosis reporting and why physician interpretation matters for coding workflow. The discussion is aimed at laboratory staff, coding professionals, and compliance personnel who handle diagnostic lab claims and payer edits.
Why This Topic Matters
Laboratory claims can be denied when diagnosis reporting does not align with physician documentation or payer requirements. Understanding the distinction between test results, reflex testing, and physician interpretation helps reduce coding errors and supports more consistent claims processing.
Article Sections
-
Question
Presents the coding scenario involving urinalysis, reflex culture, and claim denials. The section frames the documentation dispute and the payer-related concern raised by the lab manager.
-
Answer
Discusses the general concept of reflex testing and the need for physician interpretation in support of diagnosis reporting. It also notes the importance of verifying denial reasons with the payer.
-
Tip
Offers a brief follow-up suggestion about confirming the cause of denied claims with the payer or insurer representative.
What You Will Learn
- How reflex testing is described in the context of laboratory workflow
- Why physician interpretation is relevant to diagnosis reporting for laboratory services
- How to approach investigating the reason for payer denials on lab claims
- What kinds of documentation questions can arise with urinalysis-related testing
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Laboratory billing staff
- Compliance personnel
- Revenue cycle staff
- Emergency department billing staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com