tci General Surgery Coding Alert - 2003 Issue 8

Reader Question: Number of Lines Matters for Modifier -59

Question: I reported 10021-59 x 2 for two separate aspirations on the same breast. Medicare denied the second line as a duplicate and paid for one unit only. How should I have coded this? Arkansas Subscriber  Answer: Although you are correct to append modifier -59 (Distinct procedural service) to describe two distinct fine needle aspirations (10021, Fine needle aspiration; without imaging guidance), you did not apply the modifier correctly when submitting your claim form. Most payers want you to report the first unit on a separate line with no modifiers attached. You may report second and subsequent...

To read the full article, sign in and subscribe to tci General Surgery Coding Alert.


Leverage vital, to-the-point monthly guidance to boost your reporting accuracy and your coding know-how. We make it convenient for your team to stay informed, compliant, and profitable with a subscription to TCI’s General Surgery Coding Alert.

  • Current newsletters added each month
  • Fully searchable archives - over 2100 articles
  • ALL years/issues back to 1999 organized by year and issue
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles
Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • tci General Surgery Coding Alert +Archives

demo
request yours today
 subscribe
start today
 newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.