Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement - 2005 Issue 10
Part B Coding Coach: 4 Q&A's End Your Exasperation With E/M Guidelines
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a set of questions and answers drawn from CMS guidance on evaluation and management documentation. It is aimed at coders, auditors, and billing staff who work with physician documentation, medical decision-making, and test-ordering activity. The discussion focuses on broad documentation concepts, audit-tool interpretation, and how different kinds of test-related actions may be counted in the E/M record.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding how E/M documentation is interpreted can affect how encounters are coded and supported in the record. The article is especially relevant for practices that frequently document test orders, test review, and related medical decision-making.
Article Sections
-
Collect Credit for Diagnostic Decisions
This section addresses how physician documentation around diagnostic choices is discussed in the context of E/M complexity and the care plan. It also includes a billing-oriented example involving patient refusal and test-related documentation.
-
Don't Dismiss HPI Elements
This section focuses on history documentation and the handling of common HPI elements when symptoms are absent or not linked to certain triggers. It also references the broader role of documentation detail in establishing history level.
-
Award Credit for Test Ordering and Review
This section covers CMS commentary on audit tools, test ordering, and review activity across different parts of CPT. It also notes specialty-specific relevance and the use of carrier audit tools.
-
Account for Image Ordering and Review Separately
This section discusses separate documentation of ordering and personally reviewing diagnostic studies. It addresses how this activity is treated within the data portion of E/M complexity and the relevance for physicians who interpret their own studies.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS guidance addresses documentation tied to diagnostic testing and medical decision-making
- How HPI documentation elements are discussed when symptoms are absent or nonspecific
- How audit tools and carrier practices are described in relation to test ordering and review
- How separate documentation of ordering and personally reviewing diagnostic studies is discussed in E/M coding context
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Physician billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
- Specialty clinicians documenting E/M services
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com