tci Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement - 2007 Issue 34
CODING: Is Your Practice Losing $160 Every Time You Bill 55876?
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article examines a coding and reimbursement controversy involving fiducial marker placement for prostate radiation therapy. It is aimed at coders, billers, and practices trying to understand payer treatment of the procedure, related supply coding, and how professional societies and Medicare-related guidance have addressed the issue. The discussion centers on coverage variation, appeals, documentation, and policy statements that affect whether supplies are paid separately.
Why This Topic Matters
The article matters because it highlights a common source of denials and revenue loss when practices bill for a procedure and its associated supplies. It also helps readers understand why payer responses may differ and why documentation and appeals can be important in resolving claims.
Article Sections
-
Best bet: Be prepared to submit invoices and CPT book photocopies
Introduces the billing dispute and the kinds of supporting documentation discussed in the article.
-
Myth / Reality
Summarizes the general confusion about separate reporting and payer reimbursement for associated supplies.
-
Nightmares
Describes claim denials and the documentation practices used in attempts to obtain payment.
-
Appeal
Covers the appeal process and the role of invoices and claim-specific review.
-
Positive sign
Notes a payer policy example and a related unlisted supply approach discussed in the article.
-
Hospitals and professional society response
Touches on hospital billing considerations and the positions of professional organizations.
-
Controversy
Reviews disagreement between stakeholders about payment treatment in the Medicare fee schedule context.
-
Bottom line
Provides the article’s closing summary of the billing and documentation issues raised.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames payer confusion around fiducial marker billing
- What types of documentation are discussed in the context of appeals
- Which organizations and policy sources are referenced in the reimbursement debate
- How the article situates the issue within Medicare and commercial payer practices
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Urology practices
- Radiation oncology practices
- Compliance staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com