EHRs: Hurry up: MU Reporting in 2015 Requires CEHRT

Why This Topic Matters

The article matters because it describes federal changes that affect how providers prepare for reporting, what technology must be in place, and how timing shifts may influence compliance planning for upcoming payment years.

Article Sections

1. How Your MU Requirements Changed

   Summarizes the revised meaningful use framework and the broad categories of providers affected by the final rule. It covers the overall reporting-period and technology-availability changes addressed by CMS and ONC.

2. Choose from 3 Options

   Outlines the general paths described for providers facing certified EHR technology implementation issues. The section explains that the article discusses alternative reporting approaches tied to CEHRT availability.

3. Will Rule’s Timing Cost You Next Year?

   Discusses concerns raised about the timing of the final rule and its implications for the next reporting year. It focuses on industry reaction and the potential impact of reporting duration on compliance planning.

4. Bright Spot: Enjoy a Stage 3 Delay

   Describes the updated Stage 3 timeline and the stated rationale for the delay. The section places the change in the context of continued Stage 2 implementation and policy development.