Know The Coding Errors That CMS Evaluated

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by AAPC. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article summarizes CMS improper payment findings from 2018 and organizes them into major categories of billing and documentation problems. It is aimed at coders, auditors, compliance staff, and providers who want a high-level view of the kinds of issues CMS evaluates and why claim support matters. The discussion includes general examples and references to CMS reporting, but does not serve as a coding manual.

Why This Topic Matters

Understanding the categories CMS uses to classify improper payments helps readers recognize common risk areas in documentation, medical necessity review, and code reporting. The article is useful for organizations trying to reduce denials, audit exposure, and billing errors.

Article Sections

  1. Insufficient Documentation

    Explains the category CMS uses when records do not adequately support that a service was provided or warranted. Includes a brief illustrative example of missing record elements.

  2. Medical Necessity Errors

    Covers the category used when a billed service or item is not supported by the patient’s clinical need. Includes an example involving review of a billed procedure.

  3. Incorrect Coding

    Describes the category for claims where the reported code does not match the documented service. The section contrasts the reported code with a reviewed service level in a general example.

  4. No Documentation

    Summarizes errors attributed to missing, unavailable, or unsubmitted documentation. The section emphasizes the importance of maintaining records for review.

  5. “Other” Errors

    Addresses miscellaneous issues that do not fit the other main categories. Examples are described only at a broad level.

What You Will Learn

  • How CMS grouped improper payment findings into major categories
  • What kinds of documentation problems commonly trigger review findings
  • How medical necessity and coding errors are discussed at a high level
  • Why missing or incomplete records can affect claim review
  • What types of miscellaneous issues CMS places in an other category

Who Should Read This

  • Medical coders
  • Billing staff
  • Compliance professionals
  • Auditors
  • Physicians and other providers

Codes Discussed


Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Keep pace with evolving Medicare regulations — and onboard your team — with timely analysis of critical updates interpreted in an easy-to-follow, easy-to-apply format. Your subscription to TCI's Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement Alert will equip you to navigate code and guideline changes, CCI edits, and revisions to modifiers, payer policies, the fee schedule, OIG target areas, and more.

  • Current newsletters added each month
  • Fully searchable archives - over 4200 articles
  • ALL years/issues back to 2003 organized by year and issue
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles

This feature is currently unavailable for online purchase. For more information, please call 801-770-4203 or Contact Us.

Related Articles

Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?