Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement - 2021 Issue 8
Specialty Spotlight: Capitalize on These 10 Tips to Code ED Encounters at Higher Level
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium article is a coding-focused discussion for emergency medicine and outpatient E/M documentation. It explains why history remains important in ED encounter level selection, highlights documentation areas that commonly affect audit risk, and summarizes practical topics such as chief complaint, HPI, ROS, and PMFSH under existing and evolving E/M frameworks. It is aimed at coders, auditors, and ED providers who want to better understand documentation expectations without relying on detailed code-by-code instruction.
Why This Topic Matters
ED documentation quality can influence code selection, compliance risk, and the ability to support higher-level E/M services. The article helps readers understand which history elements matter most and how documentation habits may need to adapt as E/M guidance changes.
Article Sections
-
Tip 1: Be Flexible About E/M Code Longevity
Discusses the stability of current ED E/M guidance in the context of broader E/M changes and the need to prepare for future documentation updates.
-
Tip 2: Be Careful When Carrying Over Chief Complaint
Covers the role of chief complaint documentation in supporting history and the risks of relying on incomplete information carried over from other sources.
-
Tip 3: Note Influence of HPI Before Selecting Code
Explains the importance of the history of present illness in assessing the overall complexity of an ED visit.
-
Tip 4: Focus on These 8 HPI Elements
Introduces the major components commonly used to assess HPI completeness in emergency medicine documentation.
-
Tip 5: Know Depth of Each HPI Element
Reviews how the individual HPI components are understood in general terms and why specificity matters in documentation.
-
Tip 5: Try This Example to Check Understanding of HPI
Uses a sample ED scenario to illustrate how multiple history elements may appear in a note.
-
Tip 6: Know HPI May Not Always Be Attainable
Addresses situations where a complete HPI is difficult to obtain and discusses documenting limitations that affect history capture.
-
Tip 7: Go Beyond Diagnosis in ROS
Covers the review of systems as a documented component of history and emphasizes the need for system-by-system responses.
-
Tip 8: Stay Wary of This Phrase
Discusses common ROS wording concerns and why broad shortcut language can create documentation issues.
-
Tip 9: Don’t Count on Payment With “Not Pertinent” PMFSH
Addresses documentation of past medical, family, and social history and the limitations of generic phrasing.
-
Tip 10: Look to Lowest Section to Choose History Level
Summarizes how the individual history components work together when determining the overall history level.
What You Will Learn
- How ED history documentation supports E/M level selection
- Which history components are emphasized in emergency department encounters
- How HPI, ROS, and PMFSH documentation are discussed in the context of audit readiness
- Why documentation completeness matters when E/M guidance changes
- How limiting circumstances can affect history capture
Who Should Read This
- Emergency department coders
- Coding auditors
- Emergency medicine providers
- Compliance staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com