Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement - 2005 Issue 4
Tried and True Tricks for Audit-Proof MDM
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers documentation practices that affect medical decision-making review for emergency department E/M coding. It is aimed at coders, auditors, and clinicians who want to better understand how chart detail, complexity, and supporting documentation influence code selection and audit defensibility. The discussion focuses on general documentation improvement themes, physician communication, and review of common record elements used in E/M evaluation.
Why This Topic Matters
Medical decision-making documentation is a major factor in E/M reporting accuracy and audit support. Clear records can help align reported levels with the documentation and reduce risk when claims are reviewed.
Article Sections
-
7 tips to perfect your E/M choices
An overview of practical documentation habits that can make E/M selection easier and more consistent. The section frames the article’s focus on emergency department medical decision-making and record support.
-
Tip 1
Guidance on documenting patient complexity and complicating factors that may influence decision-making. The section emphasizes the importance of complete clinical context in the record.
-
Tip 2
Discussion of how test ordering, medications, and diagnostic uncertainty can signal complexity in the chart. The section also touches on documenting the clinician’s working assessment and planned workup.
-
Tip 3
Advice on record format and the limitations of templates or checklists for higher-complexity visits. The section addresses the value of narrative documentation when explaining clinical choices.
-
Tip 4
Suggestions for using medical decision-making as part of the workflow when estimating E/M level. The section compares decision-making review with other elements used in chart assessment.
-
Tip 5
A reminder that reported levels must be supported by the documentation in the medical record. The section discusses audit risk when severity is perceived as higher than what is written.
-
Tip 6
Discussion of documenting interim treatment steps and the possibility of escalation in care. The section focuses on how follow-up plans and treatment progression can be reflected in the record.
-
Tip 7
Advice on obtaining more detail when chart entries are brief or incomplete. The section highlights the need to clarify ambiguous statements and related follow-up findings.
What You Will Learn
- How emergency department medical decision-making is discussed in relation to E/M coding
- Ways documentation detail can affect audit support
- Common chart elements that may signal higher complexity
- Why narrative support can matter more than templates alone
- How to improve physician documentation for coding review
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Physicians and other clinicians
- E/M coding educators
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com