Outpatient Facility Coding Alert - 2019 Issue 7
E/M Auditing: Use CBR Data Effectively With These 3 Hints
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers how provider practices can use Medicare Comparative Billing Reports and related practice-management data to review evaluation and management coding patterns. It is aimed at coding professionals, auditors, and physician practices that want to compare billing behavior against peers, assess documentation consistency, and support internal benchmarking efforts. The guidance is presented as practical audit-focused advice and includes references to Medicare contractors, specialty-level comparisons, and EHR-generated reporting.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding billing pattern data can help practices identify outlier coding behavior, focus audit efforts, and support more consistent internal review processes without waiting for an external Medicare audit.
Article Sections
-
Introduction to Comparative Billing Reports
Explains the role of Medicare billing comparison reports and how they relate to oversight and practice review. Introduces the general idea of comparing billing patterns with peer groups.
-
Context from Medicare Administrative Contractor Guidance
Summarizes the contractor perspective on how billing pattern data is compared within jurisdictions and peer groups. Describes the kinds of broad comparisons the reports are intended to support.
-
Use the Reports to Benchmark Your Practice
Discusses how practices can review their own patterns against state and national averages. Covers the general value of specialty-based comparisons and personalized report requests.
-
1. See Where Your Practice Falls
Focuses on using report data to understand where a practice fits among peers. Highlights that comparisons should be interpreted in light of specialty and patient mix.
-
2. Pull Charts at Random for Best Audit Results
Describes using report findings as a starting point for chart review and internal audit sampling. Emphasizes the role of documentation review and discrepancy tracking.
-
MAC advice
Includes contractor guidance on self-auditing and ongoing evaluation processes. Presents the broader reasons practices are encouraged to review claims and documentation regularly.
-
3. Measure Your Stats Against Local Peers
Covers comparison of providers within the same practice or local environment. Discusses how internal review can identify variation that may be hidden in average figures.
-
Don’t Forget to Mobilize Your EHR for Benchmarking, Too
Describes using electronic health record and practice-management reporting tools for benchmarking and audit support. Notes that these systems can generate usage and productivity data for analysis.
What You Will Learn
- How Medicare billing comparison reports can be used in practice review
- Why specialty-based and local peer comparisons matter
- How report findings can lead into chart sampling and internal audits
- How EHR and practice-management reports can support benchmarking efforts
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Physician practice managers
- Compliance staff
- Billing staff
- Physicians involved in E/M documentation review
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com