Outpatient Facility Coding Alert - 2014 Issue 23
Electronic Health Records: CMS Proposal Could End EHR Meaningful Use Woes
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers a CMS and ONC proposed rule addressing the Meaningful Use EHR Incentive Programs, including timeline adjustments, certification edition flexibility, reporting pathways for eligible providers and facilities, and related clinical quality measure reporting changes. It is relevant to healthcare organizations, clinicians, and compliance staff tracking EHR adoption and federal reporting requirements. The article also notes the broader context of stage timing, attestation considerations, and potential payment impacts tied to noncompliance.
Why This Topic Matters
The proposal affects how providers may satisfy federal EHR incentive requirements and continue reporting during a transition period. It matters because organizations need to understand changing timelines, documentation expectations, and potential reimbursement consequences.
Article Sections
-
CMS proposal and EHR meaningful use timeline
Introduces the proposed federal rule and its effect on Meaningful Use timing for EHR incentive programs. Summarizes the general purpose of the changes and the organizations involved.
-
Stage 2 deadline extension
Describes the proposed extension of Stage 2 timing and the broader operational context behind provider concerns. Addresses how the rule relates to EHR technology implementation and reporting readiness.
-
Compliance options for certification editions
Outlines the proposed reporting pathways tied to different EHR certification editions. Covers the categories of eligible providers and facilities affected by the options.
-
Noncompliance and payment impacts
Summarizes the continued federal enforcement posture despite the proposed timing relief. Notes the general reimbursement impact associated with failing to meet EHR requirements.
-
Clinical quality measure reporting changes
Explains that the proposal also affects clinical quality measure reporting requirements in 2014. Discusses how submission method guidance may vary based on the EHR edition deployed.
-
Comment deadline and source reference
Provides the public comment window and references the federal rule source. Includes a pointer to where the proposed rule can be reviewed.
What You Will Learn
- How the proposed CMS rule affects EHR meaningful use timing
- Which provider categories are discussed in the proposal
- How the article frames reporting flexibility during the transition period
- What general categories of quality reporting changes are included
- Why compliance deadlines and federal comments are important to providers
Who Should Read This
- Healthcare providers
- Compliance officers
- Health information management professionals
- Practice administrators
- Hospital and clinic leadership
- EHR implementation teams
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com