Outpatient Facility Coding Alert - 2005 Issue 2
Evaluation & Management: Docs Kissed Nearly $1 Billion Goodbye In 2004
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers a Medicare payment accuracy issue involving evaluation and management services, with attention to CMS findings from an error-rate review and the AMA’s response to proposed documentation and clinical-example initiatives. It is relevant to physicians, coders, billing staff, and compliance professionals who follow E/M guidance, audit findings, and organization-level efforts to improve coding accuracy.
Why This Topic Matters
It highlights how E/M coding practices can affect physician reimbursement and why national coding organizations and CMS were debating documentation tools, pilot studies, and education strategies.
Article Sections
-
CMS error-rate findings and E/M undercoding
Summarizes the payment accuracy issue described in the article and the role of physician visits in the broader underpayment discussion.
-
CMS request for improved documentation guidance
Describes CMS interest in revising guidance and examples to support more accurate evaluation and management coding.
-
AMA response and pilot study results
Covers the AMA’s position on further changes and the outcomes of earlier pilot testing involving clinical examples.
-
Education and next steps
Notes the organizations’ focus on physician education and ongoing development efforts related to E/M coding.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS characterized the payment accuracy issue involving physician visits
- What CMS asked the AMA to improve
- How the AMA responded to further changes in E/M guidance
- What the article says about pilot study performance and education efforts
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com