Part B Insider - 2017 Issue 5
Policy Change: Understand NGS Policy Update on Exam Levels
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers a Medicare contractor policy update from National Government Services (NGS) that changes how exam level expectations are interpreted for evaluation and management documentation. It places the update in the context of the 1995 and 1997 E/M Documentation Guidelines, then discusses the practical implications for coders, physicians, and specialty practices. The article is relevant for medical coders, compliance staff, and providers who need to understand contractor-specific documentation expectations and how they relate to broader CMS guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Changes to contractor-specific exam expectations can affect documentation review, coding selection, and consistency across payer policies. Understanding the relationship between local policy and E/M guideline frameworks helps practices align documentation with the expectations used in claims review.
Article Sections
-
Discover Meaning of NGS Exam Requirement Change
Introduces the Medicare contractor update and explains the general focus of the policy change. It also identifies the effective date and the reason the contractor gave for revising its exam expectations.
-
Understand Differences Between 1995 vs. 1997 E/M Guidelines
Summarizes the two documentation guideline sets discussed in the article and compares their broad exam framework. It highlights that the article contrasts the way each guideline set organizes exam levels and documentation scope.
-
Ask the Pros: How the NGS Change Impacts Coders
Presents commentary from coding and compliance professionals on the practical effects of the policy update. The section discusses how the change may influence documentation review, coder interpretation, and specialty-specific workflow.
What You Will Learn
- The scope of an NGS policy update affecting E/M exam level expectations
- How the article compares the 1995 and 1997 E/M Documentation Guidelines
- Why contractor-specific exam interpretation matters for documentation and coding
- How coders and providers may be affected by changing review expectations
- Which specialties may feel the impact of the policy change more strongly
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians
- Practice managers
- Medical billers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com