Part B Insider - 2012 Issue 4
Reader Question: Not All Family Earns 'Family History'
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This reader Q&A explains a colonoscopy coding scenario under ICD-9, focusing on how family history, pathology results, and screening status affect diagnosis reporting. It is aimed at coders and billing staff who work with gastroenterology, preventive screening, and insurer-specific eligibility rules. The article covers the distinction between different family-history scenarios, references common high-risk screening indications, and notes when pathology findings drive the reported diagnosis.
Why This Topic Matters
Correctly distinguishing family history from pathology findings affects diagnosis reporting for screening colonoscopy claims and helps determine whether a case may qualify as high-risk screening under insurer criteria.
Article Sections
-
Question
Presents the coding scenario involving a screening colonoscopy, a reported family history, and a pathology result.
-
Answer
Addresses the diagnosis-reporting approach discussed in the article and frames the family-history issue under ICD-9.
-
High-risk screening
Summarizes general eligibility categories referenced for screening colonoscopy and the related ICD-9 screening context.
-
Report findings
Notes the role of pathology findings in the reported diagnosis for the scenario.
What You Will Learn
- How a screening colonoscopy scenario is discussed in relation to family history and pathology findings
- What general factors are referenced for high-risk screening colonoscopy eligibility
- How the article frames the relationship between screening indications and reported findings
- Which ICD-9 topics are involved in this reader question
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Gastroenterology coding professionals
- Compliance staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com