Part B Insider - 2010 Issue 8
Reader Questions: If Cancer's Still Present, Ignore 'History of' Codes
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This short Q&A article addresses a common oncology coding question about distinguishing an active cancer diagnosis from a past-history diagnosis category. It explains the issue in general terms, references ICD-9 coding guidance, and is aimed at coders who need to interpret documentation about completed treatment, recurrence, and follow-up status.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate selection between active-disease and history-based coding affects how the patient’s record is interpreted for ongoing care, follow-up, and monitoring. The article helps coders understand the documentation context that determines which type of diagnosis category is appropriate.
What You Will Learn
- How documentation status affects whether a past-history diagnosis category may be appropriate
- Why treatment completion and recurrence status matter in oncology coding
- How general ICD guidance frames past medical conditions that no longer exist but may require monitoring
- When follow-up context can affect diagnosis-category selection
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Oncology coders
- Health information management professionals
- Clinical documentation staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com