Part B Insider - 2020 Issue 12
Reader Questions: Site Drives Coding for Procedure Plus Hernia
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This reader Q&A discusses how to evaluate whether two planned surgical procedures performed in the same operative setting can be reported separately based on anatomic site and documentation. It references NCCI policy guidance and CPT code selection considerations for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hernia repair, along with modifier use in a general coding context. The article is relevant to professional coders, billers, and compliance staff working with surgical reporting and bundling edits.
Why This Topic Matters
Correct reporting of multiple procedures depends on documentation, operative site, and applicable policy guidance. Understanding the topic helps coding staff assess when separate billing may be supported and when it may not be appropriate.
Article Sections
-
Question
The reader asks about reporting two planned surgeries in the same operative session and whether a modifier is appropriate when both are scheduled in advance.
-
Answer
The response discusses the importance of anatomic site documentation, references policy guidance, and outlines the general conditions under which separate reporting may be considered.
What You Will Learn
- How anatomic site documentation affects reporting of multiple procedures
- How NCCI policy guidance is relevant to hernia repair reporting
- How general modifier use may relate to separate procedure reporting
- How the topic applies to laparoscopic surgery coding scenarios
Who Should Read This
- Professional coders
- Medical billers
- Compliance staff
- Surgical practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com