AHA Coding Clinic® for HCPCS - 2026 Quarter 2; Ask the Editor
Endoscopic Bladder Stone Removal Via Percutaneous Cystotomy
A patient presents with bladder stones greater than 2.5 cm and a retained left ureteral stent. A percutaneous cystolithotomy with left ureteroscopy, stone vacuum extraction, and ureteral stent removal are performed. The urethral meatus was intubated with a flexible cystoscope. Upon direct vision large bladder stones were noted. The left ureteral stent was grasped and brought to the meatus and the left wire that was passed up to the kidney was utilized to pass a flexible ureteroscope up to the kidney and a full pyeloscopy and ureteroscopy were performed. Small fragments remained and they were vacuum extracted with the scope. The patient was repositioned, and under ultrasound and cystoscopic guidance, an 18-gauge needle was placed into the bladder through a suprapubic approach. A 30 Fr incision was made, and a Nephromax 30 Fr dilator was used, and under visual guidance a 30 Fr sheath was placed. A 10 mm endo-catch bag was placed through the sheath, and the stones were placed inside. The bag was closed and secured. After the sheath was replaced into the bag, the Nephroscope was used with a rigid lithotripter to break up the massive hard stones, and all fragments were extracted along with the stent. At the conclusion of the procedure, a suprapubic catheter was placed and secured for drainage. When bladder stones are removed endoscopically by cystolitholapaxy via a percutaneous cystotomy, what is the appropriate CPT code(s) to report? Is an additional code reported to capture the percutaneous cystotomy? Or would an unlisted code be reported to capture the stone removal by endoscopic cystolitholapaxy via percutaneous cystotomy? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium article reviews a surgical case involving endoscopic management of bladder stones through a percutaneous suprapubic approach, along with ureteral access, stone extraction, and stent removal. It is relevant for coders, auditors, and urology billing professionals who need to understand the scope of the procedure, related endoscopic components, and how the operative narrative is structured for coding review.
Why This Topic Matters
Percutaneous and endoscopic urologic procedures can involve multiple procedural components and site-specific documentation that affect coding review. This article helps readers assess the operative scope, related instrumentation, and the clinical context documented in the report.
What You Will Learn
- The overall procedural setting and operative context for bladder stone removal
- How associated ureteral and bladder endoscopic components are documented in an operative note
- The types of information coders review in a combined urologic procedure report
- How percutaneous access and extraction techniques are described in surgical documentation
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Urology billers
- Clinical documentation specialists
- Auditors
- Revenue cycle professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com