AHA Coding Clinic® for ICD-9 - 1992 First Quarter
ICD-9-CM, Medical Record Practitioners and the Joint Commission Agenda for Change
by Betty Fuchs, R.R.A., M.S. Project Manager Alpha Field Activities Department of Outcomes Research and Development(1) Hundreds of medical record practitioners throughout the nation are assisting with an important component of the Joint Commission Agenda for Change-the development and testing of indicators. Their contributions to this project, spanning several years, have been valuable and constant. This update on the project describes some of the many ways medical record practitioners have contributed to the development and research undertaken to improve the quality of patient care. Overview of the Joint Commission agenda for change Indicator development through the...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains the Joint Commission’s Agenda for Change and the broader effort to develop, test, and refine performance indicators for health care organizations. It highlights the contribution of medical record practitioners, the use of ICD-9-CM in indicator work, and common implementation issues such as coding policies, data entry, definitional concerns, and system limitations. It is relevant to medical record professionals, quality improvement staff, and others involved in indicator development or evaluation.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding how indicators are developed and tested helps organizations assess data reliability, compare performance measures more effectively, and identify operational issues that can affect quality reporting.
Article Sections
-
Overview of the Agenda for Change
Introduces the Joint Commission initiative and its focus on performance measurement, standards, and continuous quality improvement.
-
Indicator Development
Describes how indicator concepts were formed through expert task forces and how medical record practitioners contributed to the process.
-
Indicator Testing
Summarizes the two-phase testing process used to assess indicators and their feasibility for broader use.
-
Medical Record Practitioners' Roles
Outlines the ways medical record practitioners support research, registries, data elements, and operational implementation.
-
The Agenda for Change and ICD-9-CM
Explains the relationship between ICD-9-CM and indicator development and testing, including the use of provider-site feedback.
-
Working Together to Improve the Quality of Care
Reviews examples of how collaboration between practitioners and the Joint Commission helps clarify indicator development and evaluation issues.
-
False positive data findings
Discusses an example of how data interpretation can affect indicator results during evaluation.
-
Coding Policies
Addresses how institutional differences in coding and data storage can influence indicator-related information.
-
Data Entry
Explains how data transfer and entry processes may affect the accuracy of indicator-related information.
-
Applying Definitions
Notes that definitional issues can affect how coded data are interpreted in indicator evaluation.
-
Data Systems
Describes how technical limits in data systems can affect the capture and retrieval of coded information.
-
The Agenda for Change and You
Concludes with the role of ongoing evaluation and collaboration in improving indicators and quality of care.
What You Will Learn
- How the Joint Commission’s Agenda for Change is structured at a high level
- How performance indicators are developed and tested
- How medical record practitioners contribute to quality measurement work
- How ICD-9-CM supports indicator development and evaluation
- What types of operational issues can affect indicator data quality
Who Should Read This
- Medical record practitioners
- Health information management professionals
- Quality improvement staff
- Hospital administrators
- Clinical data and performance measurement teams
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com