AHA Coding Clinic® for ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS - 2014 Issue 3; Ask the Editor
Use of Imaging Reports for Greater Specificity
Previous Coding Clinic advice has supported the assignment of a more specific fracture code in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM based on findings in imaging reports when a physician has documented a diagnosis of fracture. Does this advice hold true for other conditions that may be further specified based on imaging reports? For example, if a patient is diagnosed with a cerebral infarction or hemorrhagic stroke, can the imaging results be used to identify the specific vessel associated with these conditions? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This short Coding Clinic-style article discusses the use of imaging reports to support greater anatomic specificity when a physician has already documented certain diagnoses. It is aimed at medical coders, CDI professionals, and compliance staff who need to understand the scope of this guidance and how it relates to coding specificity across coding systems. The article addresses the general issue of whether imaging can be used to identify a more specific site for selected conditions and frames the discussion around previously issued coding advice.
Why This Topic Matters
Coding workflows often depend on whether supporting documentation can be used to refine diagnosis specificity. Understanding the boundary of this guidance helps organizations apply documentation consistently without overstepping source documentation.
Article Sections
-
Overview and question about imaging-based specificity
Introduces the issue of whether imaging findings may support greater specificity for diagnoses already documented by a physician. The section frames the discussion around prior coding guidance and asks whether the same approach applies beyond fractures.
-
Guidance on using imaging reports for anatomic site specificity
Summarizes the article’s guidance on using imaging reports to identify a more specific anatomic location for certain documented conditions. The section focuses on the general scope of this documentation-based specificity concept.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames the use of imaging reports in relation to documented diagnoses
- What type of specificity the guidance addresses at a broad level
- Which kinds of coding and documentation questions the article is intended to clarify
- How the article situates this advice in relation to prior coding guidance
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Clinical documentation improvement specialists
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Health information management staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com