AMA CPT® Assistant - 2004 Issue 12 (December)
Cardiovascular System/Surgery (December 2004)
December 2004 page 18b Coding Consultation:Questions and Answers Cardiovascular System/Surgery, 34802, 34805 (Q&A) Question Can you provide clarification regarding the difference between codes 34802, Endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm or dissection; using modular bifurcated prosthesis (one docking limb), and 34805, Endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm or dissection; using aortouniiliac or aorto-unifemoral prosthesis? AMA Comment From a CPT coding perspective, code 34805 differs from existing code 34802 in description of the configuration, length, and shape of the prosthesis required to treat the aneurysm effectively. The prosthesis described by code 34802 is constructed of two separate...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This December 2004 CPT Assistant Q&A article focuses on cardiovascular system surgery coding and clarifies how two endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair codes are distinguished in CPT. It is relevant to professional coders, auditors, and reimbursement staff who need to understand the scope of the discussion and the general type of code-comparison guidance provided in the article.
Why This Topic Matters
The article helps readers identify whether the discussion applies to CPT cardiovascular surgery coding and whether it addresses code comparison questions for endovascular aneurysm repair procedures. It is useful when reviewing older CPT guidance for documentation review, code selection support, or coding education.
Article Sections
-
December 2004 page 18b
Introductory publication reference for the Q&A content appearing in this issue.
-
Coding Consultation: Questions and Answers
A coding consultation format presenting a reader question and an AMA response about cardiovascular surgery coding.
-
Cardiovascular System/Surgery, 34802, 34805 (Q&A)
The main topic area covering a comparison of two CPT cardiovascular surgery codes within an endovascular repair context.
-
Question
The reader’s request for clarification about the coding distinction being discussed.
-
AMA Comment
The AMA’s explanatory response discussing the broader procedural comparison at issue.
What You Will Learn
- How the article is organized as a CPT Assistant coding consultation.
- What general cardiovascular surgery topic area the article addresses.
- That the discussion centers on a comparison between two endovascular repair codes.
- The type of guidance provided by the AMA in response to a coding question.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Physician coding educators
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.



Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com