AMA CPT® Assistant - 1996 Issue 10 (October)
Correction (October 1996)
October 1996 pages 2-4 Correction In the September 1996 issue, on Coding Endoscopic vs. Open Surgical Procedures , code 58985 was incorrectly listed. It should have been 56304 . Correction. CPT® Assistant. 1996; October 1996 pages 2-4 ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This short correction notice from CPT Assistant addresses an error carried forward from a September 1996 article about coding endoscopic versus open surgical procedures. It is relevant to coding professionals who track editorial updates and historical code references in CPT-focused guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Corrections like this help readers distinguish an earlier miscitation from the intended code reference in archived coding guidance. That is important for anyone reviewing historical CPT Assistant content for research, auditing, or education.
Article Sections
-
October 1996 pages 2-4
A brief correction notice tied to a prior CPT Assistant article. It identifies an amended code reference in the context of endoscopic versus open surgical procedure coding.
What You Will Learn
- How a published correction notice is presented in CPT Assistant
- How to recognize that a prior article contains an amended code reference
- How historical coding guidance may be updated through editorial corrections
- How to interpret the scope of a brief CPT-focused erratum
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding educators
- Compliance staff
- Auditors
- Healthcare documentation reviewers
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com