AMA Clinical Examples in Radiology - 2011 Issue 4 (Fall)
Documentation Challenge
Documentation Challenge Reports that fail to adequately support the coding for the procedure performed not only have serious implications for fraud and abuse, but may also negatively impact how the physician can report the procedure. In each issue, you will be provided with a documentation challenge. This documentation challenge will serve as a learning tool for both coders and physicians. Clinical History Severe abdominal pain; evaluate for mesenteric ischemia. Comparison None. Technique Axial images are acquired from the lung bases through the symphysis pubis following administration of intravenous (IV) contrast material during the arterial phase of imaging to evaluate...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article presents a documentation-focused radiology coding challenge involving abdominal and pelvic cross-sectional imaging. It explains why the technical report details matter, highlights the type of information that must be documented for accurate code assignment, and places the case in the context of 2012 CPT updates and related ACR/AMA guidance. It is useful for coders, radiologists, and other imaging documentation stakeholders who want to understand the documentation issues that affect how the service is reported.
Why This Topic Matters
Incomplete imaging documentation can affect coding accuracy, compliance, and whether the reported service matches the work actually performed. This article helps readers recognize the documentation elements that drive correct selection among closely related CT and CTA services.
Article Sections
-
Documentation Challenge
Introduces the coding and documentation issue presented in the imaging report example. Sets the stage for a learning-focused review for coders and physicians.
-
Clinical History
Summarizes the reason for the examination and the general clinical context for the study. Provides the broad scenario prompting the imaging service.
-
Comparison
Identifies whether prior imaging was available for comparison. Establishes the reporting context without adding interpretive detail.
-
Technique
Describes the imaging approach, anatomic coverage, and contrast-related procedural information documented in the report. Focuses on the technical elements relevant to coding review.
-
Findings
Lists the main imaging observations across vascular, abdominal, pelvic, and musculoskeletal structures. Provides the report content used to evaluate the documentation challenge.
-
Impression
Presents the report’s summarized diagnostic impressions. Reflects the concluding radiology interpretation included in the source.
-
Discussion
Explains the documentation issue at the center of the challenge and frames the coding question for 2012. Also introduces the broader context of combined abdominal and pelvic CTA reporting.
-
New Combined CTA Abdomen and Pelvis Code Available in 2012
Reviews the 2012 code-set update related to combined abdominal and pelvic CTA reporting. Places the change in the context of national coding guidance and related procedural bundling concepts.
-
References
Lists supporting professional guidance and source materials cited by the article. Includes AMA and ACR references used for background.
What You Will Learn
- Which documentation elements are important when reviewing abdominal and pelvic cross-sectional imaging reports
- How a missing technical detail can affect whether a CT or CTA service is supported
- What 2012 CPT guidance added for combined abdominal and pelvic CTA reporting
- How the article situates the case within radiology coding and documentation guidance
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Radiology coders
- Radiologists
- Compliance staff
- Imaging documentation reviewers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com
