AMA CPT® Assistant - 2011 Issue 10 (October)
Lower Extremity Revascularization (37220-37235): Additional Catheterization Reporting (36200, 36245, 36246) (October 2011)
October 2011 page 9 Lower Extremity Revascularization (37220-37235): Additional Catheterization Reporting (36200, 36245, 36246) The July 2011 edition of CPT Assistant featured an article discussing the intent and use of the lower extremity revascularization procedure codes. Also included in the article were several commonly asked questions related to specific therapeutic lower extremity revascularization interventions involving additional arterial catheterization. To offer further clarification, several examples are provided here to illustrate the reporting of those instances in which catheterization of specific artery(ies) (eg, external iliac, common iliac) may or may not allow for additional reporting. In particular, code 36200 , Introduction of...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This CPT Assistant article reviews guidance on lower extremity revascularization and when related catheterization services may be reported separately in certain situations. It is relevant to coders, auditors, and revenue cycle professionals working with endovascular procedures, diagnostic catheterization, and outpatient hospital billing guidance. The article also includes a short discussion of closure device reporting at arterial puncture sites and a facility reporting note tied to CMS OPPS tracking.
Why This Topic Matters
Proper reporting of catheterization services around lower extremity revascularization affects claim accuracy and helps avoid duplicate or incomplete reporting. The article provides clarification for professionals who code interventional vascular procedures and outpatient hospital services.
Article Sections
-
Additional Catheterization Reporting for Lower Extremity Revascularization
Introduces the topic of catheterization reporting in relation to lower extremity revascularization procedures and the general purpose of the clarification. It frames the article around scenarios where associated vascular access work may be considered separately.
-
Exception 1
Describes a scenario involving diagnostic work performed from a separate puncture site than the intervention. The section explains the broad reporting context for catheterization in this setting.
-
Exception 2
Covers a scenario in which the diagnostic study uses the same access site but requires a higher level of selectivity than the intervention. The section discusses reporting considerations for the additional catheterization work.
-
Exception 3
Addresses a setting where a non-lower extremity intervention is performed at the same session as a lower extremity endovascular intervention. The section focuses on the broader reporting relationship between the procedures.
-
Closure Device at Arterial Puncture Site
Summarizes guidance on closure of vascular access sites and includes a facility reporting note related to outpatient hospital tracking. The section also references the involvement of CMS and OPPS.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames additional catheterization reporting in the setting of lower extremity revascularization
- What kinds of scenarios are discussed for separate diagnostic and interventional catheterization reporting
- How the article addresses catheterization work in mixed procedure sessions
- What the article says about closure device reporting and outpatient hospital tracking
- Which organizations and billing contexts are mentioned in the guidance
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Revenue cycle staff
- Outpatient hospital billing staff
- Vascular procedure documentation teams
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com