AMA CPT® Assistant - 1996 Issue 10 (October)
Results of the 1996 CPT Assistant Readership Survey (October 1996)
October 1996 page 8 Coding Commentary Results of the 1996 CPT Assistant Readership Survey In May, we sent out a readership survey to assess how subscribers feel about the quality of the newsletter and about the changes we made in January 1996, when we shifted from a quarterly to a monthly publication, shortened stories, and added several new features. We wanted to hear directly from you what about CPT Assistant you like and what additions or improvements we might consider to better meet your needs for timely, comprehensive CPT coding information. The Results are in! The results of that...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reports the findings of a reader survey about CPT Assistant, including how subscribers rated the newsletter’s quality, format changes, and specific features. It is relevant to coders, editors, and healthcare professionals interested in CPT coding publications, editorial planning, and the kinds of content readers found most valuable. The article also touches on broader content areas the newsletter was covering at the time, such as coding consultation topics and related regulatory and policy subjects.
Why This Topic Matters
For readers, editors, and coding professionals, the article provides a snapshot of how a major CPT coding publication was perceived after format changes and what kinds of educational content subscribers wanted more of. It helps contextualize the newsletter’s editorial direction and the general interests of the coding community in 1996.
Article Sections
-
Coding Commentary
Introduces the survey report and explains the purpose of gathering reader feedback on the newsletter and its recent format changes.
-
The Results are in!
Summarizes overall survey participation and broad reader satisfaction with the publication.
-
Overall Reader Satisfaction
Reviews how respondents rated the newsletter and the general categories of features they found most useful.
-
Assessing the New Format
Describes the recent redesign and publication changes and summarizes reader reactions to the updated format and added features.
-
Are We Meeting Our Goals?
Presents reader feedback on the newsletter’s stated goals and the ratings given to its regular features.
-
Constructive Criticism
Reviews dissatisfaction themes, audience fit concerns, and suggested future topics and communication improvements.
-
Continued Feedback
Closes with an invitation for ongoing reader comments and suggestions.
What You Will Learn
- How the readership survey was conducted and what it aimed to measure
- What general aspects of the newsletter readers valued most
- How subscribers responded to the new monthly format and added sections
- Which broad feature categories received favorable feedback
- What kinds of topic suggestions readers offered for future issues
Who Should Read This
- CPT coders
- Coding educators
- Healthcare documentation staff
- Medical newsletter editors
- Practice managers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.



Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com