If a patient presents with a right ventricular (RV) lead and has the battery removed and replaced to add a left ventricular (LV) lead, is the removal and replacement reported with code 33263 (REVISED IN 2015), Removal of pacing cardioverterdefibrillator pulse generator with replacement of pacing cardioverter-defibrillator pulse generator; dual lead system, because there are two leads involved? Or is it appropriate to report code 33264 , Removal of pacing cardioverterdefibrillator pulse generator with replacement of pacing cardioverter-defibrillator pulse generator; multiple lead system, because the device may be capable of multiple leads? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium Find-A-Code article addresses a CPT coding question about replacement of a pacing cardioverter-defibrillator pulse generator in the setting of lead configuration changes. It is aimed at coders and billers working with cardiovascular device procedures, and it focuses on how lead-system terminology affects code selection in this scenario.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate reporting for implanted cardiac device procedures depends on understanding how the lead configuration is classified. The article helps readers identify the relevant CPT code family and recognize the broader coding context for generator replacement procedures involving additional leads.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames a coding question involving pacing cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacement
- How lead-system terminology is discussed in relation to coding selection
- The general CPT context for cardiac device replacement procedures involving ventricular leads
- Why the distinction between lead-system types matters for procedural reporting
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing specialists
- Cardiology practice staff
- Compliance professionals
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com