BC Advantage - 2018 Issue 10
The Big MIPS HAP CMS Finds Errors in MIPS Payment Calculations
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers a CMS announcement about errors found in MIPS score and payment adjustment calculations for the 2017 performance year. It is aimed at clinicians, groups, and APM entities that use the Quality Payment Program portal and want to understand when a targeted review may be relevant, what kinds of documentation may be requested, and the general implications of score recalculations. The discussion stays focused on program operations, timing, and review logistics rather than detailed coding guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
MIPS scoring affects payment adjustments, so even small calculation issues can change financial outcomes and trigger follow-up action through the CMS review process. Understanding the scope of the CMS update helps affected participants decide whether they should review their feedback and consider a targeted review request.
Article Sections
-
CMS announcement and identified scoring issues
Summarizes the CMS statement about targeted review findings and the general categories of scoring logic issues involved in the 2017 MIPS performance year.
-
Know your score
Discusses how participants can review MIPS performance feedback in the QPP portal and compare category-level information for possible discrepancies.
-
Scaling factor and budget neutrality
Explains the relationship between final scores, payment adjustments, and the broader budget-neutral structure of the program.
-
Still want a targeted review?
Outlines the general targeted review request process, who may submit, and the types of supporting materials that may be needed.
-
Targeted review timing and outcomes
Covers the review deadline extension and describes how review results and any updated feedback are communicated.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS described the 2017 MIPS scoring issue
- How to review MIPS performance feedback in the QPP portal
- What a targeted review is used for in general
- What kinds of supporting documentation may be requested
- How review outcomes and updated feedback are communicated
Who Should Read This
- MIPS-eligible clinicians
- Medical groups
- APM entities
- Quality Payment Program users
- Practice administrators and compliance staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com