BC Advantage - 2018 Issue 10
When to Use Modifier 25 and Modifier 57 on Physician Claims
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews the general distinction between two physician-claim modifiers and why the difference matters for E/M reporting and claim review. It is written for coders, auditors, and billing professionals who need a high-level understanding of how documentation, same-day services, and surgical context affect modifier use. The article also notes common situations where one modifier is sometimes applied incorrectly and contrasts broader claim scenarios involving surgery-related decision-making.
Why This Topic Matters
Correct modifier selection affects whether an E/M service is considered separately payable on a physician claim and can influence audit risk, claim bundling, and compliance review.
What You Will Learn
- How two physician-claim modifiers differ in general purpose
- Why documentation in the medical record matters for E/M reporting
- How same-day services can affect modifier consideration
- How surgical context changes the discussion around modifier use
- Common categories of situations where modifier use may be questioned
Who Should Read This
- Physician coders
- Medical billers
- Compliance auditors
- Practice managers
- Revenue cycle staff
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com