BC Advantage - 2017 Issue 3
Documentation: Carrying Forward or Ineffective Use of Templates
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses a documentation and auditing question commonly raised in evaluation and management (E&M) scoring: when information appears to be carried forward, cloned, or populated through templates, how should it be viewed in relation to the current encounter. It discusses the topic in the context of CMS guidance, electronic health records, patient-specific relevance, and audit review. The piece is aimed at coders, auditors, compliance staff, and clinicians who review documentation for E&M evaluation and general medical record integrity.
Why This Topic Matters
Carried-forward documentation and template use can affect how auditors interpret whether note content is relevant to the current encounter. Understanding the article helps readers evaluate documentation quality and compliance concerns without relying on assumptions about copied material.
What You Will Learn
- How carried-forward documentation is discussed in the context of E&M scoring
- How copy/paste and template-driven notes are viewed in audit review
- Why patient- and encounter-specific relevance matters in documentation assessment
- How CMS-related clarification is referenced in relation to electronic health records
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Medical auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Clinical documentation staff
- Physicians and other providers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com