BC Advantage - 2016 Issue 5
Why are Evaluation and Management Services Being Scrutinized?
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses why evaluation and management services are frequently targeted for review by oversight and audit programs, and why providers may be flagged as outliers. It covers broad documentation and compliance issues, internal audit practices, provider education, and the role of coding guidance for common medical coding sets. The piece is aimed at providers, auditors, compliance staff, and coders who want to understand the general risk areas and preparation strategies associated with evaluation and management billing.
Why This Topic Matters
Evaluation and management claims are a major focus of audit activity because they are closely tied to documentation quality, coding accuracy, and payment integrity. Understanding the article helps readers identify the broader compliance areas that can affect Medicare and other payer reviews.
Article Sections
-
Why EM services are being scrutinized
Introduces the audit and oversight focus on evaluation and management services and the broader reasons these claims attract review. It discusses risk patterns, payment integrity concerns, and provider outlier analysis.
-
What providers can do to avoid an audit
Presents broad preparation themes for organizations that want to be ready for review. The section frames the discussion around compliance readiness rather than audit avoidance.
-
1. Understand Evaluation and Management (EM) Coding Guidelines
Summarizes the role of official evaluation and management guideline sets and why coders and providers need to be familiar with them. It also touches on payer adoption and documentation expectations at a high level.
-
2. Learn Proper Documentation Habits
Covers documentation practices that can affect coding accuracy, including electronic record workflows, staff involvement, and timeliness of completion. The section also discusses general concerns related to record quality and audit review.
-
3. Conduct Annual Internal Audits and Report Findings
Describes internal audit and compliance program considerations for healthcare organizations. It addresses routine review, corrective action, and follow-up training in a general compliance context.
-
4. Institute Provider Education and Training Programs
Explains the importance of education on coding rules, payer-specific requirements, and documentation fundamentals. The section emphasizes training as part of broader billing and compliance preparation.
-
Consider the following example for potential CMS False Claims Act penalties that could easily be associated with a smaller organization.
Provides a general audit example illustrating how documentation discrepancies can lead to compliance exposure and financial consequences. It is framed as a sample review scenario rather than a coding guide.
What You Will Learn
- Why evaluation and management services are often subject to audit and oversight
- How documentation quality influences coding and compliance risk
- What broad internal audit and education practices are discussed for provider preparedness
- How the article frames payer, CMS, and OIG scrutiny of billing patterns
- Which general coding and documentation topics are emphasized for compliance review
Who Should Read This
- Physicians and other healthcare providers
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance officers
- Practice managers
- Auditors
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com