BC Advantage - 2017 Issue 9
Exclusive interview with Dr. David Nilasena - Chief Medical Officer at the CMS Dallas office
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article is an interview with a CMS regional medical officer covering the rollout and administration of the Quality Payment Program. It discusses broad Medicare policy topics such as MIPS, APMs, MACRA, ACA-related context, reporting timelines, performance categories, technical assistance, and how different practice types may be affected. The piece is useful for clinicians, practice managers, coders, billers, and others following CMS payment reform and quality reporting programs.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand the scope of CMS guidance, the practical issues surrounding program participation, and the kinds of reporting and operational considerations practices need to monitor under Medicare payment reform.
Article Sections
-
Introduction and CMS role
The interview begins with background on the speaker and his role in CMS Region IV. It also introduces his work supporting clinicians, providers, and internal CMS staff.
-
Career background and CMS program experience
This section summarizes the speaker’s prior CMS work and his experience across quality improvement, outreach, and payment reform initiatives. It frames how that background relates to his current responsibilities.
-
How new CMS programs are implemented
The discussion explains the broader process CMS uses to administer programs under federal authority. It covers rulemaking, public comment, and the relationship between legislation and implementation.
-
ACA context and the Quality Payment Program
This part addresses how current ACA-related activity may relate to the Quality Payment Program. It focuses on the legislative context and general program independence.
-
MIPS and APM participation considerations
The interview turns to broad participation considerations for clinicians choosing between MIPS and APM pathways. It also mentions available support resources for moving toward alternative payment arrangements.
-
MIPS performance categories and reporting timelines
This section discusses the main MIPS performance categories and the timing for performance-year data submission. It also references different submission channels and related reporting periods.
-
Conference questions on MIPS participation and exclusions
The speaker addresses common attendee questions about participation thresholds, voluntary participation, Medicare Advantage, and registration-related issues. The focus is on general program administration and eligibility topics.
-
Benchmarks and reporting mechanisms
This section describes how benchmarks are developed for quality reporting and notes that different reporting mechanisms are handled separately. It also references the general approach planned for other categories.
-
Effects on small, rural, and multispecialty practices
The interview covers how program features may affect practices of different sizes and settings. It highlights flexibilities, group reporting, assistance resources, and proposed supports for smaller organizations.
-
CMS technical assistance resources
This part outlines the types of free support CMS offers to clinicians and practices. It points readers to general resources for assistance with quality payment participation and practice transformation.
-
Implications for coders and billing staff
The discussion shifts to the role of coders and billing teams in supporting claims accuracy and data submission. It emphasizes why practice workflows matter under the Quality Payment Program.
-
Payment adjustments and exceptional performance
This section explains the general relationship between MIPS scoring and Medicare payment adjustments. It also discusses the separate pool for exceptional performance and the broader framework for bonuses and penalties.
-
Advancing Care Information and certified technology
The interview covers certified health IT expectations under the Advancing Care Information category. It also mentions verification resources and certification-number reporting.
-
CPC+ and Advanced APM considerations
The final section addresses the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus model and its relationship to the Quality Payment Program. It discusses general participation considerations for eligible primary care practices.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS describes its role in implementing new payment and quality programs
- The broad structure and purpose of the Quality Payment Program
- General considerations involved in MIPS and APM participation
- How MIPS reporting, scoring, and payment adjustment concepts are discussed at a high level
- What kinds of support CMS offers clinicians, practices, coders, and billing staff
- How certified health IT and primary care models fit into the broader program framework
Who Should Read This
- Physicians and other clinicians
- Practice managers
- Medical coders
- Medical billing staff
- Compliance and revenue cycle professionals
- Health policy readers
- Quality reporting staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com